- Collection Overview
- Collection Description & Creator Information
- Access & Use
- Collection History
- Find Related Materials
Gates debate (research), 1993
Collection Description & Creator Information
Files are arranged in the order in which they came to Princeton.
- Custodial History
This collection was transferred directly to the custody of the ACLU Archives in the summer of 2008 by Jennifer Bellusci, Nadine Strossen's assistant, following Strossen's resignation as the ACLU's National Board President. The collection was transferred to Princeton University in April 2012.
No records have been separated from this collection.
- Processing Information
These papers were processed by Maureen Callahan in 2012. An inventory created in a spreadsheet was converted to EAD and materials were arranged into series at this time. Materials in the June 2013 accession (ML.2013.018) were transferred from five large transfile boxes to standard record center boxes upon arrival at the library. The 2013 accession was added to the collection as a new series. A file-level inventory was created in September 2013. No physical processing or arrangement took place at this time.
Access & Use
- Conditions Governing Access
The collection is open for research, with the exception of records related to David Souter, which shall be closed during his lifetime.
- Conditions Governing Use
Single photocopies may be made for research purposes. For quotations that are fair use as defined under U. S. Copyright Law, no permission to cite or publish is required. For those few instances beyond fair use, researchers are responsible for determining who may hold the copyright and obtaining approval from them. Researchers do not need anything further from the Mudd Library to move forward with their use.
- Physical Characteristics and Technical Requirements
For preservation reasons, original analog and digital media may not be read or played back in the reading room. Users may visually inspect physical media but may not remove it from its enclosure. All analog audiovisual media must be digitized to preservation-quality standards prior to use. Audiovisual digitization requests are processed by an approved third-party vendor. Please note, the transfer time required can be as little as several weeks to as long as several months and there may be financial costs associated with the process. Requests should be directed through the Ask Us Form.
- Credit this material:
Gates debate (research); Nadine Strossen Papers, MC258, Public Policy Papers, Department of Special Collections, Princeton University Library
- Seeley G. Mudd Manuscript Library65 Olden StreetPrinceton, NJ 08540, USA
- Storage Note:
- Mudd Manuscript Library (mudd): Box 22